7: On Writing Well

On Writing Well: An Informal Guide to Writing NonfictionOn Writing Well: An Informal Guide to Writing Nonfiction by William Knowlton Zinsser

My rating: 4 of 5 stars

Borrowed from the VPL.

Read in February 2013.

View all my reviews

Here are some notes I took. I feel like I’m quoting myself; so many of these points are things I say all the time.

  • “Our national tendency is to inflate and thereby sound important.” (7) We think if a sentence is too simple, there must be something wrong with it. ha!
  • Simplify! Clear the clutter.
  • “My reason for bracketing superfluous words instead of crossing them out was to avoid violating the students’ sacred prose.” (17) ha!
  • carpentry analogy: simple and solid first, learn to embellish later—comes with practice
  • deliberately embellishing is like wearing a toupee. be yourself. (I need to remember that one.)
  • first paragraphs and pages can be discarded!
  • use “I”—take responsibility for your ideas!
  • write for yourself, in the sense that you shouldn’t worry “whether the reader likes you, or likes what you are saying or how you are saying it, or agrees with it, or feels an affinity for your sense of humor or your vision of life” (27)
  • think about how you writing sounds—read aloud
  • usage changes, but…
    • avoid jargon. be precise.
    • be liberal with new words and phrases.
    • be conservative with grammar.
  • think small—try to leave the reader with one provocative thought
  • nonfiction can be literature; it’s not inferior to fiction
  • interviews:
    • take notes; record only as backup. “Be a writer. Write things down.” (70)
    • quotes will need to be moved around, spliced together—but do not fabricate!
  • places are second only to people
  • memoir—narrowness of focus, like a window or photograph into a life
  • science writing
    • “describe how a process works”—exercise that helps people learn to write more clearly
    • think of science writing as an upside-down pyramid—start with one fact the reader needs to know, then build from there
  • jargon = people wanting to sound important. hahaha. yes.
  • “I consider it a privilege to be able to shape my writing until it’s as clean and strong as I can make it. … Students, I realize, don’t share my love of rewriting. They regard it as some kind of punishment, or extra homework. Please—if you’re such a student—think of it as a gift.  You’ll never write well unless you understand that writing is an evolving process, not a one-shot product.” (187-188)
  • distinction between a critic and a reviewer: “As a reviewer your job is more to report than to make an aesthetic judgment.” (215)

This was an older edition of the book, so some of the examples and advice (try a word processor! you’ll like it!) were dated. There’s a newer, 20th anniversary edition that I’m sure resolves those issues.

I think this should be required reading for 1st year university/college students. So much of it is stuff I find myself explaining to 3rd, 4th, 5th years—but I never know how much takes. Especially with certain students who seem to interpret tips like “simple is better” to mean “I’m too dumb to understand your deep thoughts,” having a “textbook” that backs me up might make them more likely to take my advice seriously.

6: Mean Boy

Mean BoyMean Boy by Lynn Coady

My rating: 4 of 5 stars

From the fall 2010 VPL book sale.

Read in January/February 2013.

View all my reviews

The protagonist of Mean Boy is Lawrence (formerly Larry) Campbell, age 19. He’s from Prince Edward Island and is attending Westcock University in New Brunswick. It’s 1975.

The title is ironic. On page 35, he says, “I am trying to be meaner these days…” The highlight of Lawrence’s university experience is the poetry class he’s taking with his hero, poet Jim Arsenault.

Lawrence uptalks, which distresses him. Jim calls him “Larry” which annoys him.

Jim has been denied tenure, much to Lawrence’s consternation (he would have gone to the University of Toronto if Jim hadn’t been at Westcock). He and some of the other students (Todd and Sherrie) in the poetry class decide to write a letter to the admin and get all the students to sign it. The petition feels like a transgressive act to Lawrence and Sherrie.

Meanwhile, there are student/prof drinking-parties at Jim’s house and a poetry reading by Dermot Schofield, Jim’s frenemy + fellow poet, which turns into a comedy of errors. Oh, an awesome subplot featuring Lawrence’s cousin Janet that turns out to be not what you think. Instead, Lawrence learns a lesson about distancing yourself from your family in order to be able to write about them.

In the end, everyone’s flaws are revealed.

I guessed that “Westcock” was actually Mount Allison and a quick search confirmed that supposition to be correct. And it turns out that the character of Jim Arsenault is based on real-life poet/Mount Allison prof John Thompson, which apparently cheesed off some people who knew him. Interesting.

I’ve read all of Lynn Coady’s books prior to this one (Strange Heaven, Play the Monster Blind, Saints of Big Harbour; her latest, The Antagonist, is on my shelf). I read Strange Heaven because it was lauded at the time, and while I thought it was good, I didn’t really get the upop. I had the same feeling with PtMB and SoBH. Good, but missing… something. imo. Obviously others thought they were perfect. But Mean Boy, Mean Boy I loved. The ending gets a little crazy (I can’t seem to escape drug-induced hazes in fiction of late) but I will forgive this because endings are hard.

More 55-cent Books

Spring 2013 – Week 6

What I did this week:

  • Entered book data for 12 books.
  • Updated plan for next few months.
  • Worked on outline (mapping out projected lengths of chapters).
  • Entered biographical info for 5 authors.
  • Library – returned books; took out 10 more.
  • Updated Goodreads + Worldcat lists.
  • Updated spreadsheet + Scrivener project – reconciled everything.
  • Backed up project.

telegrams were kind of idiotic, too

This is why I don’t really buy this argument [that the internet is causing a decline in literacy]. I think this argument comes from people saying, “Oh, texting is so idiotic, and tweeting is so idiotic.” Well, go look at telegrams. They were kind of idiotic, too. And some of them were really good, because the person sending the telegram was taking time and care to be kind of witty. Some people take time and care in their tweets and their texts to be kind of witty. But it’s like a telegram: we can’t confuse those with literature.

Constance Hale

see it for what it really is

I want you to consider one other possibility before going the self-publishing route. I want you to consider putting your book away—as in don’t read it, edit it, or think about it—for six months. … Setting your novel aside for six months separates you from your notions of it. It empties your head of all you think your book is and allows you, six months later, to see it for what it really is. There may not be a more useful book revising tool.

Art Edwards

Spring 2013 – Week 5

What I did this week:

  • Updated WorldCat lists.
  • Skimmed + took notes on Dehaene.
  • Skimmed Complete Your Dissertation Once and For All!
  • Returned some books + picked up the last book I’d requested.
  • Worked on some tables and inserted them into the appropriate sections of project.
  • Scanned + printed 12 chapters.